Skip to content
NOWCAST KSBW Action News 8 at 11 pm
Live Now
Advertisement

With no extra money in county budgets, who funds the Newsom recall election?

With no extra money in county budgets, who funds the Newsom recall election?
TEO: A NEW POLL FROM THE PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA CONTAINS GOOD NEWS FOR GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM AS HE FACES A RECALL VOTE LATER THIS YEAR. DIERDRE: KCRA 3 POLITICAL ANALYST AND SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF RANDLE COMMUNICATIONS, KEVIN RIGGS, JOINS US IN STUDIO FOR THE RIGGS REPORT. ALL VACCINATED. KEVIN: I HAVE NOT BEEN HERE SINCE THE MARCH PRIMARY OF 2020. DIERDRE: WE HAVE CLASSED THE PLACE UP. IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME BUT WE ARE HAPPY TO HAVE YOU BACK HERE. TELL US ABOUT THE NUMBERS AND WHAT THEY MAY BE REPRESENT IN TERMS OF INTEREST IN THE RECALL. KEVIN: GAVIN NEWSOM IS IN A STRONG POSITION TO SURVIVE THE RECALL AND KEEP HIS JOB BASED ON HOW WELL THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY CONTINUES AFTER THIS COVID SHUT DOWN. THE NUMBERS ON THE PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE SHOW THAT 57% OF THOSE SURVEYED SAY THEY WILL VOTE AGAINST THE RECALL. 40% SAID THEY WOULD VOTE NO. ONLY 3% ARE UNDECIDED. HIS JOB APPROVAL RATING IS A RELATIVELY STRONG 54%. NEWSOM HAS BEEN ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS AMAZING $76 BILLION SURPLUS ANNOUNCED EARLIER THIS MONTH. HE IS TALKING ABOUT STIMULUS CHECKS AND REBATES AND EXTRA SPENDING ON SCHOOLS AND ROADS. ALL THAT EXTRA MONEY SERVES TO A DEGREE TO DOUSE VOTER ANGER. WE HAVE A LONG, HOT SUMMER AHEAD WITH WILDFIRES AND POWER SHUT OFF. HE REMAINS IN RELATIVELY STRONG POSITION POLITICALLY. TEO: LET’S TALK ABOUT FOR MANY YEARS THE WATERS OFF OF CALIFORNIA -- THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS PURSUING LARGE WIND FARMS. WHEN WITH THOSE B BUILT? KEVIN: UP UNTIL NOW THE IDEA HAS BEEN PRIMARILY AN EAST COAST THING. THE NEW ADMINISTRATION IS TALKING ABOUT OPENING UP LARGE SWATHS OF FEDERAL LAND OFF CALIFORNIA AND A COUPLE OF PLACES FOR THESE KIND OF DEVELOPMENTS. FURTHER UP TO THE NORTH OFF OF HUMBLE DAY IN EUREKA. CALIFORNIA HAS LONG SUPPORTED THESE WIND FARMS. THEY DID NOT HAVE PROGRESS UNDER THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION. THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION SAYS THEY WANT TO OPEN THIS UP RELEASING IN 2022. BY THE TIME YOU GET THE LEASES, THE PERMITS, THE CONSTRUCTION, IT WILL BE YEARS BEFORE IT IS DONE. IT’S INTERESTING CLEAN ENERGY VERSION OF THE OLD OIL LEASES THEY HAD FOR YEARS ON THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF. DIERDRE: HOUSE REPUBLICAN LEADER KEVIN MCCARTHY OF BAKERSFIELD IS NOW ON THE RECORD CONDEMNING THE BEHAVIOR OF GEORGIA REPUBLICAN MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE FOR REMARKS COMPARING MASK WEARING TO THE HOLOCAUST. WILL SHE FACE PUNISHMENT FROM REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP? KEVIN: IT’S INTERESTING. MCCARTHY DID NOT MAKE ANY MENTION OR REFERENCE TO SUPPORT FOR HAVING REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP SUPPORT A CENSURE OR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST TAYLOR GREENE FOR HER COMMENTS. SHE IS A STRONG ALLY OF PRESIDENT TRUMP WHO HAD HER COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS STRIPPED FROM HER BY DEMOCRATS THIS YEAR. MCCARTHY HAS AVOIDED CRITICIZING GREENE FOR HER BEHAVIOR, WHICH INCLUDES CONFRONTING AND MOCKING APARTMENT SCHOOL SHOOTING SURVIVOR AND SUGGESTING INTO EACH THAT LASER BEAMS FROM SPACE WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR SPARKING WILDFIRES IN CALIFORNIA. MCCARTHY COULD NOT IGNORE HER AND HE MADE COMMENTS YESTERDAY SAYING HER COMMENTS ON A PODCAST COMPARING MASK MANDATES TO THE WAY THE JEWS WERE TREATED BY NAZI GERMANY, HE CALLED THAT APPALLING. NO COMMENT ABOUT ANY MOVE TO FORMALLY CENSURE OR DISCIPLINE HER. DIERDRE: WE WILL SWITCH GEARS. THIS ONE IS KIND OF HARD. YOU ARE RETIRING AFTER DECADES OF POLITICAL COVERAGE ON KCRA AND WORKING WITH RANDLE COMMUNICATIONS. THIS IS IT. KEVIN: IT HAS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING. I HAVE BEEN ON THE AIR HERE, FIRST AS A REPORTER, ANCHOR, AND DOING CONTRIBUTE IN WORK LIKE THIS FOR 27 YEARS. IT GOES BY PRETTY QUICKLY. YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE HITS OF THE PAST. YEAH, I HAVE BEEN ON THE AIR FOR A LONG TIME AND COVERED A LOT OF NATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARIES AND LEGISLATURES, AND SOME PRETTY AMAZING STORIES OVER THE YEARS. INCLUDING THE RECALL OF GRAY DAVIS AND ELECTION OF ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. NOW IT IS TIME TO STEP DOWN. MY WIFE IS RETIRING FROM TEACHING. I AM RETIRING FROM HERE. WE WILL DO SOME TRAVEL. TEO: ARE YOU GOING TO ROCK THE ' ’STACHE. KEVIN: THE WIFE DOES NOT CARE FOR IT TOO MUCH. TEO: THIS IS FROM KCRA. OUR NEWS DIRECTOR DEREK WANTED US TO GIVE IT TO YOU. IT HAS BEEN AN HONOR TO WORK WITH YOU FOR A LONG TIME. I ALWAYS ADMIRED YOUR WORK. DIERDRE: IT HAS BEEN A PRIVILEGE TO WORK FOR SUCH A GREAT TEAM FOR SO MANY YEARS. DIERDRE: YOU HAVE BEEN A GREAT COLLEAGUE AND GREAT MENTOR TO A LOT OF US AS WE CAME IN, AND JUST A REALLY GREAT FRIEND. THAT IS ONE THING A LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T KNOW, HOW CLOSE SOME OF YOU ARE. WHEN YOU SAID YOU NEEDED TO TALK TO ME, I WAS LIKE NO, DON’T DO THIS TO ME. WE WISH YOU THE BEST, CANNOT WAIT TO SEE HAVE ANY MUSTANGS YOU ARE RESTORING IN RETIREMENT. YOU EARNED IT. WE ARE LUCKY TO HAVE HAD YOU. I WILL RECOUP AND FIX MY EYE
Advertisement
With no extra money in county budgets, who funds the Newsom recall election?
The recall election of Gov. Gavin Newsom is all but certain after the date for signers to withdraw their names from the petition has passed. But as the Secretary of State's Office now tallies up the total number of valid signatures, there's a question about who's footing the bill for the recall election. Early estimates peg the cost at $400 million.| RELATED | Secretary of State recall information"This is un-budgeted. We haven't put any money into our budget for next year to cover the cost of this," El Dorado County Registrar Bill O'Neill said.He's concerned about the cost, especially at a time when his county is already working to rebound from lost revenue during the pandemic. He said the registrar's office has a small budget, ranging from $1.3 to $1.5 million, but that includes funding for the primary election in June of next year."So that is 25% more and our department doesn't have those funds and our county is working very hard right now to get as much help out to our businesses and our residents that have been impacted by COVID," O'Neill said. "So every dollar that is taken away from the county, that is a dollar that is taken away from our voters and from our constituents in the county."The state Department of Finance has already requested the estimated cost for the recall election from each county. At the minimum, El Dorado County would need $441,778 to cover the election, O'Neill said.If the state doesn't cover the election costs, O'Neill said the money would come from the county's general fund. "And the county general fund right now is being used for other things around COVID relief, but also around roads," he said. "We are trying to free up money to be able to do more road maintenance, Health and Human Services initiatives, other things that directly impact our constituents."In Sacramento County, officials estimate $4.4 million for the election but just for services and supplies. That would not include paying staff.What lawmakers say about funding for the Newsom recall electionState Sen. Anna Caballero, a Democrat from District 12, chairs the subcommittee overseeing the budget specifically for the recall. She said she was "disappointed" that hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent for this election ahead of another new election in a year. But she said one of the state's responsibilities is to help counties with elections. Caballero maintains the matter is being taken very seriously."The state has never not stood up and helped counties to make sure that we pay for elections," Caballero said. "We're going to take care of it."However, as of right now, the cost for the recall election isn't in the budget. KCRA 3 asked Sen. Jim Neilson, the vice chair of the Budget Committee if it's possible that there won't be enough money in the budget to fund the recall."There is. Of course there is because there's billions of unfunded mandates pending right now," he said. "So of course it could. But it would certainly make the governor look bad and the Legislature look bad if they would not fund our county elections." Both Caballero and Nielson told KCRA 3 that the funding for the recall could be added after June 15. Caballero said there are several items that lawmakers are working on that will be complete by next week. Some others must be completed by August. She anticipates the recall election funding to be one of them. Meanwhile, Nielson said this year's budget as passed can still be amended through trailer bills. By definition, a trailer bill is legislation that implements specific changes to the law in order to enact the state budget. Generally, a separate trailer bill is needed for each major area of budget appropriation, such as transportation, human services, education and revenue. These bills are generally negotiated as part of the entire budget package each fiscal year.What's next in the California recall processAs far as what's next in the recall process, county elections officials will have until June 22 to report to the Secretary of State's Office the number of signatures that were withdrawn. If there are still enough valid signatures, the secretary of state would notify the Department of Finance. Within 30 days, the finance department gives the total cost to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the governor's office and the secretary of state.The committee has another 30 days to review. Afterward, the lieutenant governor is required to call a recall election between 60 and 80 days. It's predicted that the recall election could happen sometime between September and November.

The recall election of Gov. Gavin Newsom is all but certain after the date for signers to withdraw their names from the petition has passed. But as the Secretary of State's Office now tallies up the total number of valid signatures, there's a question about who's footing the bill for the recall election. Early estimates peg the cost at $400 million.

| RELATED | Secretary of State recall information

Advertisement

"This is un-budgeted. We haven't put any money into our budget for next year to cover the cost of this," El Dorado County Registrar Bill O'Neill said.

He's concerned about the cost, especially at a time when his county is already working to rebound from lost revenue during the pandemic. He said the registrar's office has a small budget, ranging from $1.3 to $1.5 million, but that includes funding for the primary election in June of next year.

"So that is 25% more and our department doesn't have those funds and our county is working very hard right now to get as much help out to our businesses and our residents that have been impacted by COVID," O'Neill said. "So every dollar that is taken away from the county, that is a dollar that is taken away from our voters and from our constituents in the county."

The state Department of Finance has already requested the estimated cost for the recall election from each county.

At the minimum, El Dorado County would need $441,778 to cover the election, O'Neill said.

If the state doesn't cover the election costs, O'Neill said the money would come from the county's general fund.

"And the county general fund right now is being used for other things around COVID relief, but also around roads," he said. "We are trying to free up money to be able to do more road maintenance, Health and Human Services initiatives, other things that directly impact our constituents."

In Sacramento County, officials estimate $4.4 million for the election but just for services and supplies. That would not include paying staff.

What lawmakers say about funding for the Newsom recall election

State Sen. Anna Caballero, a Democrat from District 12, chairs the subcommittee overseeing the budget specifically for the recall.

She said she was "disappointed" that hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent for this election ahead of another new election in a year.

But she said one of the state's responsibilities is to help counties with elections. Caballero maintains the matter is being taken very seriously.

"The state has never not stood up and helped counties to make sure that we pay for elections," Caballero said. "We're going to take care of it."

However, as of right now, the cost for the recall election isn't in the budget.

KCRA 3 asked Sen. Jim Neilson, the vice chair of the Budget Committee if it's possible that there won't be enough money in the budget to fund the recall.

"There is. Of course there is because there's billions of unfunded mandates pending right now," he said. "So of course it could. But it would certainly make the governor look bad and the Legislature look bad if they would not fund our county elections."

Both Caballero and Nielson told KCRA 3 that the funding for the recall could be added after June 15.

Caballero said there are several items that lawmakers are working on that will be complete by next week. Some others must be completed by August. She anticipates the recall election funding to be one of them.

Meanwhile, Nielson said this year's budget as passed can still be amended through trailer bills.

By definition, a trailer bill is legislation that implements specific changes to the law in order to enact the state budget. Generally, a separate trailer bill is needed for each major area of budget appropriation, such as transportation, human services, education and revenue. These bills are generally negotiated as part of the entire budget package each fiscal year.

What's next in the California recall process

As far as what's next in the recall process, county elections officials will have until June 22 to report to the Secretary of State's Office the number of signatures that were withdrawn.

If there are still enough valid signatures, the secretary of state would notify the Department of Finance. Within 30 days, the finance department gives the total cost to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the governor's office and the secretary of state.

The committee has another 30 days to review. Afterward, the lieutenant governor is required to call a recall election between 60 and 80 days.

It's predicted that the recall election could happen sometime between September and November.